xDai Energy Efficiency

lab10Collective recently compiled energy usage stats for several blockchains as well as Visa.

In this article we present an overall energy usage overview (provided by Lab10Collective) of different blockchains as well as VISA. The data shows that the xDai chain is extremely efficient while providing fast block times and a scaleable infrastructure.

Energy Usage Overview

Energy usage equivalents (number of average US households consume the same amount of energy as the following chains/Visa).

Chain / System

# of US Households

Bitcoin

5,250,408 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 ..........

Ethereum 1.0

721,223 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏡 🏡 🏡 🏡

Visa

42,702 🏘 🏘 🏘 🏡 🏡

Ethereum 2.0 *speculated

2,704 🏡

xDai Chain

2.1 👯♂

Artis

0.8 🕴

Bitcoin Footprints

A frequently mentioned concern about blockchain technology is energy consumption. Bitcoin is known to use incredible amounts of energy. The annual footprint is alarming.

Graphic and information from https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption

Ethereum currently consumes much less energy, but it is still equivalent to the energy needed to power 721,223 US homes. https://digiconomist.net/ethereum-energy-consumption. This will change with Ethereum 2.0*

Large centralized companies like VISA can process many transactions per second and require less energy: 42,702 US households. Keep in mind, however, this is just for transaction processing, not all of the power that VISA uses for things like offices, travel, banking infrastructure etc. Not to mention they are a giant centralized corporation that charges high transaction fees.

xDai Chain Efficiency

lab10Collective, a project dedicated to a sustainable energy economy and also an xDai validator, recently ran comparison data for their Artis Chain and the xDai chain relative to other transaction processing chains/systems. They found that ARTIS and xDai are extremely efficient, consuming far less power than other chains as well as payment processing giant VISA.

Efficiency is based on the number of operating nodes, hardware requirements, and TPS (Transactions per second) capacity.

The energy consumption required to run the ARTIS is equivalent to 0.8 US households annually. For xDai it is 2.1 households. ARTIS is ~ 600x more efficient than Visa, and xDai 300x+ more efficient than VISA.

Visa does have a much higher TPS (7896 max vs 119 max for xDai) at them moment. If required however, xDai can scale to offer more TPS through bridging (horizontal scalability) or node improvements (vertical scalability). These solutions would slightly increase energy requirements, but these increases would be minor relative to VISA or POW blockchains. In addition, HoneyBadger BFT consensus will improve the TPS to 476 without vastly increasing the energy consumption per TX.

xDai is extremely efficient, and further decentralization with public POSDAO will improve security and usefulness for the chain.

Energy Consumption Statistics

Stats provided by Artis. Note that TPS capacity is the absolute max capacity with simple Txs, the actual TPS is considerably lower.

TX Processor

TPS Capacity

Tx / Yr

Energy Consumption kWh

Wh/Tx

Wh/Tx Compared to Visa

avg. # of US households

Visa

7896

249,000,000,000

444,063,000

1.7834

42,702

Bitcoin

3.5

109,500,000

56,700,000,000

517,808.2192

290351x worse 🛑

5,452,447

Ethereum

34

1,072,653,061

7,500,000,000

6,992.0091

3921x worse 🛑

721,223

Ethereum 2.0*

2177

68,649,795,918

28,119,600

0.4096

4x better

2,704

xDai

119

3,754,285,714

21,900

0.0058

306x better

2.11

ARTIS

95

3,003,428,571

8,760

0.0029

611x better

0.84

HBBFT

476

15,017,142,857

52,560

0.0035

510x better

5.1

*Ethereum 2.0 will greatly reduce the Ethereum environmental footprint, although not enough is yet known to determine the total efficiency of the network. Numbers provided here are purely speculative. Lab10 estimates Eth2 will be similar to VISA in regards to energy consumption for transactions, but much more open and decentralized. Also, VISA uses much more energy to fund their corporate enterprise vs minimal energy for a decentralized blockchain.